FROM UNITED WE BLOG FOR DEMOCRATIC NEPAL!
Politics is a principal policy of state, but the state is in confusion since the CPN (Maoist) became the largest party in the CA election with 38% of 601 seats.
By Bishnu Pathak PhD
Incident IV: Against the low quality food, rampant ill-treatment and discrimination not by others, but by their own seniors, about 500 Nepal Police rank and file seized the Riot Control Battalion and the Mid-western Regional Company at Nepalgunj (about 650 km west from Kathmandu) on July 12, 2008. They took seven-senior officers including one SSP (Senior Superintendent of Police), 3 SP (Superintendent of Police) and others hostage.
Those hostages were identified as SSP Parsuram Khatri, Chief of Bheri Zone, SP Ghanashyam Bhatta, Chief of the Riot Control Battalion, and SP Akhtar Ali Ansari, Chief of the Mid-western Regional Company. The rank and file has put-forward a 20-point demand to the state. To make the officers’ captivity publicly known, the rebels fired 15 rounds onto the air from the Battalion premises. As the security and law and order providers themselves were involved in terrifying the people, Nepalgunj became tense on July 12th and 13th. Moreover, the agitating policemen warned surrounding pedestrians not to walk near the road. They barricaded the main gate with barbed wire, and shouted for action against the corrupt boss and administration.
Although the rebel police personnel freed all hostages after 36 hours of captivity, surrendering them in front of the Deputy Inspector General of Mid-Western Region at mid-night (0.00 hrs) on July 13, 2008, the emergency cabinet meeting on Sunday instructed the Home Ministry to take all necessary actions to release all those held captive. The Cabinet meeting ordered the Nepal Army to send its special commando force to bring the situation under control and to take necessary measures to avoid repeat of such incidents in the future.
Nepal police initiated disciplinary or legal action against four police personnel including the leader of the mutiny, Sub-inspector Bhan Bahadur BK, suspending them. They were produced at a press conference with handcuffs on the same day. All accused policemen appealed for mercy from senior police officers. Nineteen other officials may face action.
Excerpts of 20-point demands submitted by the mutiny cops in Nepalgunj (July 13, 2008)
• Action to be taken against the culprits of financial irregularities and return of the money to the juniors. They had received just Rs. 1,470 for ration out of the allocation of Rs. 1,501 in the fiscal year 2064/065.
• The senior officers have received double ration, reducing the juniors ration.
• The police attendant neither received clothing nor did junior police take delivery of quality clothing on time from their boss. This is against the police act.
• The canteen in the Police Training Center has become a primary resource for seniors who sell to juniors at an increased rate.
• Nepotism and favoritism have been followed in transferring, promotion and reward rather than the basis of skill and seniority.
• Seniors select their near and dear ones for better income and professional training.
• Junior police did not receive transportation costs and daily allowances as per regulation when they were mobilized for the CA elections for April 10, 2008.
• Seniors have been drinking alcohol in front of all (outside the exercise hall) after physical exercise. They usually drink each Saturday and abuse the juniors.
• A written commitment not to have any departmental action against the mutiny or agitation, ensuring concession for their fired bullets, to be furnished.
• Transfer of the hostage chiefs within 24 hours.
• The provision of “the seniors may grant leave to juniors” in police act to be amended so that leave is their right instead of the seniors’ grant.
• A deep study to be done to remove anyone from the job.
• Stern action to be taken to the senior males officers they often involve into sexual amusement with junior females on luring temptations.
• To investigate financial irregularities done by seniors and its accountants in overall management.
• Stop political intervention at the Police institution as the seniors work under political leaders’ umbrella rather than police act.
• Stop misuse of vehicles and over fuels charge done in cooperation between chief and its accountant.
• Well manage human resources, water, toilets, etc. in exercise hall.
• Stop giving priority to send near and dear officials of seniors at UN and Haiti Mission.
• The previous grade to be continued even after the promotion.
• Dialogue to be held in the presence of IGP, Home Minister, central leaders of seven party alliance, human rights workers, and journalists.
Incident III: The Probe Committee of the Regional Police Office in Pokhara recommended disciplinary action against 20 Nepal Police personnel of the District Police Office (DPO), Gorkha district (about 200 km east of Kathmandu). Those disciplined include chief of the DPO, a female DSP (Deputy Superintendent of Police) Gita Uprety on the charge of administrative carelessness on July 16, 2008. Of them, four are fired and three are demoted with the others facing various other penalties. The incident had occurred when an Assistant Inspector physically assaulted a Constable on June 19, 2008. The various ranks of police personnel staged a whole night long protest in front of DPO against the discrimination and impunity inside the office.
Incident II: About 300 disgruntled Armed Police Force (APF) of Bageshwori barracks at Shamshergunj, Banke district, revolted against bad-food, misbehavior and discrimination, beating battalion chief Harishankar Budhathoki and keeping over a dozen officers captive on June 21, 2008. The agitating forces padlocked the main gate, capturing all communication sets and telephone lines. They put-forward a 26-point demand letter to the Home Ministry the following day. On June 23, 2008, a High-Level Team lead by AIGP Narayan Raj Pandey and Joint Secretary Mod Raj Dotel of Home Ministry released all 17-hostages by signing a 22-point agreement with the displeased force, with an ultimatum to implement it within a month. The pact agreed to provide equal and decent food for all, pay medical expenses and CA poll allowances to all, etc.
The pact agreed to punish the seniors who were involved in financial irregularities including the battalion in-charge. The most perplexing fact is that Budhathoki had received a reward for his excellent work from the government only last year, but one year later he was beaten by his own juniors. On the other hand, AIG Pandey himself accepted the fact that he had been involved in financial irregularities. As a result, the question has been raised: who were right, the juniors, APF Headquarters or Budhathoki? Meanwhile, a committee was formed under SSP Rajendra Bahadur Singh to investigate alleged irregularities. Both delegates, Pandey and Dotel, appreciated the move of juniors against the seniors and vowed to initiate stern action against the seniors. Such an initiative encouraged exploited juniors to move against the inequalities, injustices, and dictatorial rule of seniors across the country. Read the rest of this entry »